<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whiny White Guys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.okobserver.net/2009/07/17/whiny-white-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.okobserver.net/2009/07/17/whiny-white-guys/</link>
	<description>To comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maesz</title>
		<link>http://www.okobserver.net/2009/07/17/whiny-white-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>maesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.okobserver.net/?p=1494#comment-250</guid>
		<description>My maternal grandmother was a teacher in Oklahoma one-room schools from the early part of the 1920&#039;s through most of the 1950&#039;s. Early in her career she received just a little over $30 per month while her male counterpart was paid almost $50 for the same month. The disparity never changed in her lifetime. It never changed for her daughter (my mother) either up through the early 1980&#039;s.

The school boards would classify my grandmother as a &quot;teacher&quot; while the male teacher in the next school over with the same number of students was referred to as a &quot;Headmaster&quot; and paid more for the title. 

For my mother the title &quot;coach&quot; was attached to practically every male teacher whether he ever set foot on a field or a court. Call him a &quot;coach&quot; and he could be paid more. Probably still is.

I have a really nasty feeling this sort of thing still goes on in public schools today.

My grandmother was not teaching for fun. She was not teaching to &quot;supplement&quot; the family income--she was the family income. Why did she deserve almost 30% less salary because she had tits and no penis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My maternal grandmother was a teacher in Oklahoma one-room schools from the early part of the 1920&#8217;s through most of the 1950&#8217;s. Early in her career she received just a little over $30 per month while her male counterpart was paid almost $50 for the same month. The disparity never changed in her lifetime. It never changed for her daughter (my mother) either up through the early 1980&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The school boards would classify my grandmother as a &#8220;teacher&#8221; while the male teacher in the next school over with the same number of students was referred to as a &#8220;Headmaster&#8221; and paid more for the title. </p>
<p>For my mother the title &#8220;coach&#8221; was attached to practically every male teacher whether he ever set foot on a field or a court. Call him a &#8220;coach&#8221; and he could be paid more. Probably still is.</p>
<p>I have a really nasty feeling this sort of thing still goes on in public schools today.</p>
<p>My grandmother was not teaching for fun. She was not teaching to &#8220;supplement&#8221; the family income&#8211;she was the family income. Why did she deserve almost 30% less salary because she had tits and no penis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.325 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-31 17:04:07 -->
